Chance experiences and choice of college major. Primary data.

Developmental Psychology

Authors(s) / Creator(s)


Abstract

Against the background of lifespan developmental psychology, social learning theory, and decision theory, the phenomenon of “chance” is examined with respect to college degree choices and its significant influence on professional development. A questionnaire survey measures the influence of chance experiences and locus of control on the college degree choices of 220 freshman college students. The results show that two-thirds of the students remember influential chance experiences which they deem important in regards to their choice of study. In particular, the number of random experiences increased the perceived study alternatives. It was indicated that chance experiences were primarily conveyed through the media. Comparing internal- vs. external-oriented people, there are no differences in the number of remembered experiences and the random assessment of their importance.
The findings suggest that the concept of chance deserves to be recognized when considering theories. The primary dataset of the survey and some derived variables are provided.

Persistent Identifier

https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.brts92zu11

Year of Publication

Funding

Citation

Bäumer, T. & Scheller, R. (2004). Chance experiences and choice of college major. Primary data. (Version 1.0.0) [Data and Documentation]. Trier: Research Data Center at ZPID. https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.brts92zu11

Study Description

Research Questions/Hypotheses:

Research Design:

Fully Standardized Survey Instrument (provides question formulation and answer options); single measurements

Measurement Instruments/Apparatus:

The survey instrument was developed and specifically designed for the study. It includes the following sections:

  1. Demographic and general information: Reported age, gender, year of graduation, field of study, information concerning previous education, surety of choice.
  2. Inventory of chance experiences: Reports 9 different chance experiences that are derived from an underlying theoretical pattern. The pattern consists of a grid that covers the 2 dimensions of source (information, person, and event) and target (alternative, knowledge, and emotion). From these 9 chance experiences, those that were not personally experienced by the subject are rejected (assigned the value 0). The remaining items are ranked in order of importance (assigned the value 1 to a maximum of 9). The subjectively most important item is then classified on a 6-point Likert scale as to its general importance.
  3. Inventory of college major choice: Following a literature review, 28 items concerning possible influences on a subject’s choice of college major were compiled. The items are classified on a 6-point Likert scale with respect to their subjective importance.
  4. The questionnaire on competence and control beliefs (Fragebogen zu Kompetenz- und Kontrollüberzeugungen, FKK) from Krampen (1991): The questionnaire measures self-concept of own abilities, internality, social externality, and fatalistic externality with 8 items for each belief. A 6-point Likert scale is used.

Data Collection Method:

Data collection in the presence of an experimenter

Population:

German freshman college students

Survey Time Period:

19th/20th of October 1992

Sample:

Convenience sample

Gender Distribution: 

60,0 % female subjects (n=132)
40,0 % male subjects (n=88)

Age Distribution: 18-28 years

Spatial Coverage (Country/Region/City): Germany/Rhineland-Palatinate/Trier

Subject Recruitment:

The questionnaires were distributed to students attending an introductory event for freshmen held at the student counseling centre at the University of Trier in the main auditorium. The questionnaires were filled out following the conclusion of the event. An experimenter stood by to answer any questions and to collect the questionnaires. The event manager brought the questionnaire to the students’ attention and asked them to participate. This introductory event took place on 2 separate days with attendees grouped by their choice of major.

Sample Size:

220 individuals

Return/Drop Out:

A total of 300 questionnaires were issued (200 on the 1st, 100 on the 2nd day). Of these, 256 (85.3%) were returned. 36 questionnaires were excluded due to missing or incorrect information.

brts92zu11_readme.txt
Text file - 3 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Description of the files

brts92zu11_pd.txt
Text file - 35 KB
MD5: 848bde400f9fc22fa2fc3a3678ce9034
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Primary data of the study

brts92zu11_kb.txt
Text file - 21 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: German codebook of primary data file brts92zu11_pd.txt

brts92zu11_ad.txt
Text file - 42 KB
MD5: da3f2079ec333d279653249b0e8f0588
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Primary data and derived variables of the study

brts92zu11_aa.txt
Text file - 2 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Dataset transformation instructions for brts92zu11_ad.txt