Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement
Personality PsychologyAuthors(s) / Creator(s)
Bergold, SebastianSteinmayr, Ricarda
Abstract
Personality predicts academic achievement above and beyond intelligence. However, studies investigating possible interaction effects between personality and intelligence when predicting academic achievement are scarce, as is the separate investigation of broad personality factors versus narrow personality facets in this context. Two studies with 11th grade students (Study 1: N = 421; Study 2: N = 243) were conducted to close this research gap. The students completed the Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000 R measuring general reasoning ability, and a well-established personality inventory based on the Five Factor Model. Academic achievement was operationalized via Grade Point Average. Study 1 revealed that Conscientiousness interacted with intelligence when predicting academic achievement: There was a stronger association between intelligence and academic achievement when students scored higher on the Conscientiousness scale. Study 2 confirmed the findings from Study 1 and also found a moderation effect of Neuroticism (stronger association between intelligence and academic achievement with lower values on the Neuroticism scale). Analyses at the facet level revealed much more differentiated results than did analyses at the domain level.
Persistent Identifier
https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.srra08pe02Year of Publication
2018Funding
Citation
Bergold, S. & Steinmayr, R. (2018). Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement (Version 1.0.0) [Data and Documentation]. Trier: Research Data Center at ZPID. https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.srra08pe02Study Description
Research Questions/Hypotheses:
We expected an interaction effect between Conscientiousness and intelligence predicting academic achievement.
We investigated in an exploratory approach if interaction effects between other personality traits and intelligence can be found.
Furthermore, we investigated in an exploratory approach, if analyses at the facet level reveal more differentiated results than do analyses at the domain level.
Research Design:
Fully Standardized Survey Instrument (provides question formulation and answer options); single measurement
Measurement Instruments/Apparatus:
Short description of the employed tests: Study 1 and 2: Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B. & Amthauer, R. (2007). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (erweiterte Aufl.). Study 2: Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae (revidierte Fassung).
Study 1: Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar nach Costa und McCrae.
Data Collection Method:
- Group Administration
- Paper and Pencil
Population:
11th grade students of German secondary schools
Survey Time Period:
Sample:
Convenience sample
Gender Distribution:
Study 1:
49,4 % female subjects (n=208)
50,6 % male subjects (n=213)
Study 2:
44,9 % female subjects (n=109)
55,1 % male subjects (n=134)
Age Distribution: Study 1: 15-18 years; Study 2: 15-18 years
Spatial Coverage (Country/Region/City): Germany/North Rhine-Westphalia and Baden-Württemberg
Subject Recruitment:
The survey took place as part of a job application training at secondary schools. The participants were informed that during the training they got to know instruments that are also used in personnel selection procedures. Participants were offered feedback on their results if they were interested. Only students whose parents had previously given their written consent could attend.
Sample Size:
Study 1: 421 individuals, Study 2: 243 individuals
Return/Drop Out:
Participation rate in both studies was 90%.
MD5: 716c9a8fb8c3346de12bd47cacdc8ff5
MD5: 1c7b7160e5308bc5defdfeb2c078aba9
Utilized Test Methods |
---|
Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe. PSYNDEX |
Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B. & Amthauer, R. (2007). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (erweiterte Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. PSYNDEX |
Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae (revidierte Fassung). Göttingen: Hogrefe. PSYNDEX |
Further Reading |
---|
Di Domenico, S. I. & Fournier, M. A. (2015). Able, ready, and willing: Examining the additive and interactive effects of intelligence, conscientiousness, and autonomous motivation on undergraduate academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 156–162. |
Heaven, P. C. L. & Ciarrochi, J. (2012). When IQ is not everything: Intelligence, personality and academic performance at school. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 518–522. |
Sackett, P. R., Gruys, M. L. & Ellingson, J. E. (1998). Ability-personality interactions when predicting job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 545–556. |
Zhang, J. & Ziegler, M. (2015). Interaction effects between openness and fluid intelligence predicting scholastic performance. Journal of Intelligence, 3, 91–110. |
Ziegler, M., Knogler, M. & Bühner, M. (2009). Conscientiousness, achievement striving, and intelligence as performance predictors in a sample of German psychology students: Always a linear relationship? Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 288–292. PSYNDEX |