Chance experiences and interest structure. Primary data on choice behavior of first-year students.
Other AreasAuthors(s) / Creator(s)
von Maurice, JuttaScheller, Reinhold
Abstract
In light of the use of the term chance in psychological and sociological literature, a model has been developed that embeds chance with rational considerations. Nine types of chance experiences at a target level (alternatives, knowledge, emotions) and a source level (person, event, information) are distinguished.
In the context of a college degree choice, the relevance of random past experiences and how these relate to features of a student's structure of interests is considered. A survey of 217 first-year college students showed that 61.3% of respondents reported at least one random experience. Chance experiences particularly increased the number of study alternatives. Chance experiences, on average, were rated as important in terms of the college degree choice students made. A weak, negative correlation was found between the number of remembered experiences and the differentiations within the interest profile. Based on these results it can be concluded that random past experiences should be considered in the context of professional aim and development. The primary data of the survey and some derived variables are provided.
Persistent Identifier
https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.meja92zu09Year of Publication
2004Funding
How to cite
Study Description
Research Questions/Hypotheses:
Research Design:
Fully Standardized Survey Instrument (provides question formulation and answer options); single measurement
Measurement Instruments/Apparatus:
Measuring the involvement of chance in a college student's choice of major using a random inventory: Statements that represent 9 different forms of random experiences were presented. The 9 experiences spanned both the target (Alternative, emotion knowledge) and source (person, event, information) objectives. The subjects first indicated whether they had personally experienced the respective random experiences (no former experience was indicated with a 0). Random experiences were then sorted according to their importance (assigning the values 1 to a maximum of 9). The subjectively most important item was then classified in terms of its general importance on a 6-point Likert scale, ranging from "very unimportant" to "very important".
Used an inventory to measure the importance of different aspects of choice when choosing a major: 28 aspects deemed influential on the choice of major were presented. Each of the experiences was weighed on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from "very unimportant" to "very important."
Acquisition of vocational interests according to the Holland's interest model (1985) and the AIST by Bergmann and Eder (1992). 60 activities were presented from different areas of interest. Interest in an activity was assessed using a 5-point scale ranging from "interests me greatly; I really enjoy doing that" to "does not interest me at all; I do not enjoy doing that at all."
Measurement of socio-demographic variables, gender, age, college major, previous vocational training, and previous college studies.
Measurement of certainty that the right choice of college major was made using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from "very unsure" to "very sure."
Data Collection Method:
Data collection in the presence of an experimenter
- Group Administration
- Paper and Pencil
Population:
German freshman college students
Survey Time Period:
October 1992
Sample:
Convenience sample
Gender Distribution:
56,2 % female subjects (n=122)
43,8 % male subjects (n=95)
Age Distribution: 18-34 years
Spatial Coverage (Country/Region/City): Germany/Rhineland-Palatinate/Trier
Subject Recruitment:
The questionnaires were distributed at freshmen orientation held at the Student Counseling Centre of the University of Trier in the Auditorium Maximum and were processed after the event. The event manager pointed the survey out to attending freshman and asked for their cooperation. The event was held across two days and divided according to the various departments of study.
Sample Size:
217 individuals
Return/Drop Out:
A total of 300 questionnaires were issued to volunteers. Of these, 253 (84.3%) were returned. Of these, 36 had to be excluded from further analysis because important information was missing. Thus, the return rate of usable questionnaires was 72.3%.
MD5: 49d3d3cfbc96f6bc424e61c0dfb09082
MD5: 3ac52cc1bac5599d06a72df92112a933
Position | Name | Label | Valid Values | Missing Values |
---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
VPNR
|
Versuchspersonennummer (intern vergeben)
|
1-217 "Versuchspersonenkennung"
|
999 "fehlender Wert"
|
2
|
AIST01
|
Item 1 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Praktisch-technische Orientierung [R]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
3
|
AIST02
|
Item 2 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Intellektuell-forschende Orientierung [I]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
4
|
AIST03
|
Item 3 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Künstlerisch-sprachliche Orientierung [A]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
5
|
AIST04
|
Item 4 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Soziale Orientierung [S]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
6
|
AIST05
|
Item 5 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Unternehmerische Orientierung [E]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
7
|
AIST06
|
Item 6 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Konventionelle Orientierung [C]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
8
|
AIST07
|
Item 7 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Praktisch-technische Orientierung [R]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
9
|
AIST08
|
Item 8 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Intellektuell-forschende Orientierung [I]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
10
|
AIST09
|
Item 9 des Allgemeinen Interessen-Struktur-Tests (Skala "Künstlerisch-sprachliche Orientierung [A]")
|
1 "Das interessiert mich gar nicht; das tue ich nicht gerne"
2 "Das interessiert mich wenig"
3 "Das interessiert mich etwas"
4 "Das interessiert mich ziemlich"
5 "Das interessiert mich sehr; das tue ich sehr gerne"
|
9 "fehlender Wert"
|
Utilized Test Methods |
---|
Bergmann, C., Eder, F. (1992). Allgemeiner Interessen-Struktur-Test. Weinheim: Beltz.
PSYNDEX
|
Further Reading |
---|
Bandura, A. (1982). The psychology of chance encounters and life paths. American Psychologist, 37, 747-755.
|
Bäumer, T., Scheller, R., von Maurice, J. (1994). Der Einfluss von Zufallserfahrungen auf die Sudienfachwahl. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 53, 166-177.
PSYNDEX
|
Cabral, A. C. & Salomone, P. R. (1990). Chance and careers: Normative versus contextual development. The Career Development Quarterly, 39, 5-17.
|
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices. A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
|
Miller, M. J. (1983). The role of happenstance in career choice. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 32, 16-20.
|
Munn, N. L. (1983). More on chance encounters and life paths. American Psychologist, 38, 351-352.
|
Salomone, P. R. & Slaney, R. B. (1981). The influence of chance and contingency factors on the vocational choice process of nonprofessional workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 19, 25-35.
|
Scheller, R. & Greve, W. (1999). Rationale Beratung: Sackgasse oder Perspektive? Integrative Therapie, 25, 64-89.
PSYNDEX
|
Scheller, R. (1986). Die Bedeutung zufälliger Ereignisse für die Laufbahnentwicklung und Laufbahnberatung. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 82, 291-298.
PSYNDEX
|
Scott, J. & Hatalla, J. (1990). The influence of chance and contingency factors on career patterns of college-educated women. The Career Development Quarterly, 39, 18-30.
|