Chance experiences and interest structure. Primary data on choice behavior of first-year students.

Other Areas

Authors(s) / Creator(s)


Abstract

In light of the use of the term chance in psychological and sociological literature, a model has been developed that embeds chance with rational considerations. Nine types of chance experiences at a target level (alternatives, knowledge, emotions) and a source level (person, event, information) are distinguished.
In the context of a college degree choice, the relevance of random past experiences and how these relate to features of a student's structure of interests is considered. A survey of 217 first-year college students showed that 61.3% of respondents reported at least one random experience. Chance experiences particularly increased the number of study alternatives. Chance experiences, on average, were rated as important in terms of the college degree choice students made. A weak, negative correlation was found between the number of remembered experiences and the differentiations within the interest profile. Based on these results it can be concluded that random past experiences should be considered in the context of professional aim and development. The primary data of the survey and some derived variables are provided.

Persistent Identifier

https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.meja92zu09

Year of Publication

Funding

Citation

von Maurice, J. & Scheller, R. (2004). Chance experiences and interest structure. Primary data on choice behavior of first-year students. (Version 1.0.0) [Data and Documentation]. Trier: Research Data Center at ZPID. https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.meja92zu09

Study Description

Research Questions/Hypotheses:

Research Design:

Fully Standardized Survey Instrument (provides question formulation and answer options); single measurement

Measurement Instruments/Apparatus:

Measuring the involvement of chance in a college student's choice of major using a random inventory: Statements that represent 9 different forms of random experiences were presented. The 9 experiences spanned both the target (Alternative, emotion knowledge) and source (person, event, information) objectives. The subjects first indicated whether they had personally experienced the respective random experiences (no former experience was indicated with a 0). Random experiences were then sorted according to their importance (assigning the values 1 to a maximum of 9). The subjectively most important item was then classified in terms of its general importance on a 6-point Likert scale, ranging from "very unimportant" to "very important".
Used an inventory to measure the importance of different aspects of choice when choosing a major: 28 aspects deemed influential on the choice of major were presented. Each of the experiences was weighed on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from "very unimportant" to "very important."
Acquisition of vocational interests according to the Holland's interest model (1985) and the AIST by Bergmann and Eder (1992). 60 activities were presented from different areas of interest. Interest in an activity was assessed using a 5-point scale ranging from "interests me greatly; I really enjoy doing that" to "does not interest me at all; I do not enjoy doing that at all."
Measurement of socio-demographic variables, gender, age, college major, previous vocational training, and previous college studies.
Measurement of certainty that the right choice of college major was made using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from "very unsure" to "very sure."

Data Collection Method:

Data collection in the presence of an experimenter

Population:

German freshman college students

Survey Time Period:

October 1992

Sample:

Convenience sample

Gender Distribution:

56,2 % female subjects (n=122)
43,8 % male subjects (n=95)

Age Distribution: 18-34 years

Spatial Coverage (Country/Region/City): Germany/Rhineland-Palatinate/Trier

Subject Recruitment:

The questionnaires were distributed at freshmen orientation held at the Student Counseling Centre of the University of Trier in the Auditorium Maximum and were processed after the event. The event manager pointed the survey out to attending freshman and asked for their cooperation. The event was held across two days and divided according to the various departments of study.

Sample Size:

217 individuals

Return/Drop Out:

A total of 300 questionnaires were issued to volunteers. Of these, 253 (84.3%) were returned. Of these, 36 had to be excluded from further analysis because important information was missing. Thus, the return rate of usable questionnaires was 72.3%.

meja92zu09_readme.txt
Text file - 3 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Description of the files

meja92zu09_pd.txt
Text file - 47 KB
MD5: 49d3d3cfbc96f6bc424e61c0dfb09082
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Primary data file

meja92zu09_ad.txt
Text file - 50 KB
MD5: 3ac52cc1bac5599d06a72df92112a933
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Primary data file with derived variables

meja92zu09_kb.txt
Text file - 32 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: German codebook for the primary data file meja92zu09_pd.txt

meja92zu09_aa.txt
Text file - 1 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Transformation instructions of the primary data file meja99zu99_pd.txt