From motive dispositions to states to outcomes: Research data of an intensive experience sampling study on communal motivational dynamics in couples

Personality Psychology

Authors(s) / Creator(s)

Zygar, Caroline
Hagemeyer, Birk
Pusch, Sebastian
Schönbrodt, Felix D.

Abstract

152 individuals from 77 heterosexual couples completed an online preliminary questionnaire on dispositional implicit and explicit motives, global relationship satisfaction, personality, satisfaction with life and decision-making in intimate relationships. 130 of these individuals took part in an experience sampling study spanning two weeks, answering questions about their momentary motivation, affect, state relationship satisfaction, behaviors and experiences in their relationship five times a day. Afterwards, 117 individuals provided feedback, assessed their relationship quality during the two weeks and answered a self-reflection questionnaire. The study was conducted to examine motivational dynamics in couples and its relevance for relationship satisfaction.

Persistent Identifier

https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.zrce16dy99_v20100

Year of Publication

2018

Funding

German Research Foundation

How to cite

Zygar, C., Hagemeyer, B., Pusch, S. & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2018). From motive dispositions to states to outcomes: Research data of an intensive experience sampling study on communal motivational dynamics in couples (Version 2.1.0) [Data and Documentation]. Trier: Research Data Center at ZPID. https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.zrce16dy99_v20100

Study Description

Research Questions/Hypotheses:

In an intimate relationship individuals have to negotiate different goals, such as when and how much time to spend together (a communion goal), or whose opinion to follow when making shared decisions (an agentic goal). We are interested in explaining

  • how situational circumstances in everyday life interact with motive dispositions to generate motivational states, such as a need to see the partner,
  • how couples regulate their individual motivations, and
  • what consequences specific dyadic behavioural patterns have for everyday and overall relationship outcomes, such as relationship satisfaction.

Specifically, we suggest that the occurrence and regulation of everyday motivational states in a couple relationship mediate the links between individual motives as dispositions and relationship outcomes.

Research Design:

Combined Standardized Survey Instruments (Combination of various standardized sections); repeated measurements

Measurement Instruments/Apparatus:

The following standardized instruments were used:
1: Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT).
2: The ABC of Social Desires. 3: Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI).
4: Positive – Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) Scale (own translation to German). 5: Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS).
6: Revised Blood & Wolfe (1960) scale for decision-making intimate relationships (own translation to German).
7: The Unified Motive Scales.
8: 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-10).
9: Self-reflection and insight scale (own translation to German).
10: Adapted Affect Grid (own translation to German).

Data Collection Method:

Collection without the presence of the investigator

  • online
  • other: Experience-Sampling with Smartphone (ESM)

Population:

German-speaking, mainly student sample, heterosexual couples

Survey Time Period:

Experience Sampling Method (ESM) over a period of 2 weeks is used asking participants to answer questions about their mood, relationship satisfaction, motivational states, the current situation’s as well as the past situation’s features, and to give an appraisal of their own as well as their partner’s behavior 5 times a day at semi-random time points within a time frame of 9,5 hours per day. This time frame was adapted to the participants’ preferred times, with starting times ranging from 8:00 to 10:30 and ending times ranging from 21:30 to 24:00. Participants registered for participation and filled in an online preliminary questionnaire before starting the ESM part of the study. For the ESM part of the study, the participants used their own smartphones. After the two weeks of experience sampling had finished, the participants filled in additional online feedback questionnaires.

Sample:

Convenience sample;
Participants using non-compatible smartphones as well as homosexual individuals were not eligible for participation.

Gender Distribution:

50% female subjects (n=76)
50% male subjects (n=76)

Age Distribution: 18-40 years

Spatial Coverage (Country/Region/City): Germany

Subject Recruitment:

Recruition: Announcements, newsletter, facebook, personal contacts
Motivation: Reminder after one week, course credits and raffle of Amazon vouchers depending on response rate

Sample Size:

77 couples

Return/Drop Out:

Mean compliance of ESM was 84%.

zrce16dy99_readme.txt
Text file - 4 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Description of the files

zrce16dy99_fd1.csv
CSV file - 128 KB
MD5: 7374e442ad3479d941adc27a14a2f673
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Research data of the preliminary questionnaire

zrce16dy99_fd2.csv
CSV file - 319 KB
MD5: 7044f351db142a05c064697dc46c6779
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Research data of coded PACT-stories

zrce16dy99_fd3.csv
CSV file - 31956 KB
MD5: f160b29f0ce8972226ddedb2681cade9
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Research data of Experience Sampling, longformat

zrce16dy99_fd4.csv
CSV file - 4409 KB
MD5: 241d94f860393d68693d815c5e384f39
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Research data of the Experience Sampling part of the study (wide format)

zrce16dy99_fd5.csv
CSV file - 55 KB
MD5: df219998ef382aac861d0d1fd46b5fa5
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Research data of feedback questionnaire

zrce16dy99_kb1.csv
CSV file - 46 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Codebook of research data file zrce16dy99_fd1.csv

zrce16dy99_kb2.txt
Text file - 3 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Codebook of research data file zrce16dy99_fd2.csv, coded PACT stories

zrce16dy99_kb3.csv
CSV file - 3 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Codebook of research data file zrce16dy99_fd3.csv, Experience Sampling, Longformat

zrce16dy99_kb4.csv
CSV file - 45 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Codebook of research data file zrce16dy99_fd4.csv, Experience sampling part of the study, wide format

zrce16dy99_kb5.csv
CSV file - 7 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Codebook for the research data file zrce16dy99_fd5.csv, feedback survey

couple_matching_data.csv
CSV file - 3 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Matching table for couple (paarid) and subject ID (code_new)

create_esm_dat_file.R
R script file - 3 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: R-script for transformation and aggregation of raw data

create_fb_dat_file.R
R script file - 1 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: R-script for transformation and aggregation of raw data

create_preq_dat_file.R
R script file - 5 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: R-script for creation of data file Preliminary questionnaire data: record_matrix.csv and pact_coding_data: record_matrix.csv from raw data

data_preparation_PACTs.R
R script file - 5 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: R-script for computation of PACT variables

esm_items.pdf
PDF file - 339 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Items of Experience Sampling

esm_training.pdf
PDF file - 246 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Instructions of the training for Experience Sampling

fb_items.pdf
PDF file - 3187 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Questionnaire

Images_for_esm_items.pdf
PDF file - 478 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Images for the items “mood” and “ipc”

Item_sets.pdf
PDF file - 65 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Information about item sets

preq_items.pdf
PDF file - 2011 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Items of preliminary questionnaire

Preregistration_by_Baumann_Zygar_Schoenbrodt.pdf
PDF file - 361 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Preregistration by Baumann, Zygar, Schönbrodt: “A dyadic study on the effect of communal motivation and conflict on relationship satisfaction and mood.”

Preregistration_by_Zygar_Schoenbrodt.pdf
PDF file - 722 KB
Sharing Level 1 (Scientific Use)
Description: Preregistration by Zygar & Schönbrodt: “From motive dispositions to states to outcomes An intensive experience sampling study on motivational dynamics in couples – Study 1.”

Position Name Label Valid Values Missing Values
0
session
Session-ID
k.A.
NA
1
created
Session-Beginn, zur Anonymisierung manuell auf NA gesetzt
k.A.
NA
2
modified
zur Anonymisierung manuell auf NA gesetzt
k.A.
NA
3
ended
Session-Ende
{TRUE=Fragebogen abgeschlossen}{FALSE=Fragebogen nicht abgeschlossen}
NA
4
expired
zur Anonymisierung manuell auf NA gesetzt
k.A.
NA
5
check1
Teilnahme-Bestätigung
k.A.
NA
6
teilnahme
Bisherige Teilnahme
{1=Ja}{2=Nein}
NA
7
birth
ehemalig Geburtsdatum, nach Anonymisierung: Alter in Kategorien
k.A.
NA
8
sex
Geschlecht
{1=männlich}{2=weiblich}{3=Anderes, und zwar ...}
NA
9
sex_o
Anderes Geschlecht
k.A.
NA
Page 1 of 19
Items per page: 10 25 50
Position Name Label Valid Values Missing Values
0
LoginTime
Login in der App (zur Anonymisierung auf NA gesetzt)
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
1
CompletedTime
k.A. (keine Angabe)
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
2
EventIndex
Survey- / Befragungsindex
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
3
EventName
Name der Befragung
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
4
ItemName
Name des Items
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
5
EventStartTime
Geplante Startzeit der Befragung (zur Anonymisierung auf NA gesetzt)
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
6
EventTimeoutTime
Timeout der Befragung (zur Anonymisierung auf NA gesetzt)
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
7
EventState
Beantwortungsstatus der Befragung
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
8
EventStartedTime
Tatsächliche Startzeit der Befragung (zur Anonymisierung auf NA gesetzt)
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
9
EventCompletedTime
Tatsächliche Endzeit der Befragung (zur Anonymisierung auf NA gesetzt)
k.A. (keine Angabe)
NA
Page 1 of 2
Items per page: 10 25 50
Position Name Label Valid Values Missing Values
0
VAR_1
Laufende Nummer
keine Angabe (k.A.)
NA
1
code_new
Teilnehmer-Code (abgewandelt): Zuordnung zur Paar-ID siehe Datei couple_matching_data.csv
k.A.
NA
2
Day
Tag
k.A.
NA
3
EventIndex
Survey- / Befragungsindex
k.A.
NA
4
EventStartTime
Geplante Startzeit der Befragung (zur Anonymisierung auf NA gesetzt)
k.A.
NA
5
EventStartedTime
Tatsächliche Startzeit der Befragung (zur Anonymisierung auf NA gesetzt)
k.A.
NA
6
EventCompletedTime
Tatsächliche Endzeit der Befragung (zur Anonymisierung auf NA gesetzt)
k.A.
NA
7
event.lag
Zeit zwischen geplanter und tatsächlicher Startzeit der Befragung
k.A.
NA
8
Var.8
Befragungsstatus
{1=Ausgefüllte Befragung}{0=Abgebrochene oder verpasste Befragung}
NA
9
0.Agen.F
Schulung: Agency-Befriedigung durch Freunde
k.A.
NA
Page 1 of 12
Items per page: 10 25 50
Position Name Label Valid Values Missing Values
0
Antwort.ID
k.A. (keine Angabe)
k.A.
NA
1
Letzte.Seite
Letzte Seite, bis zu der die Befragung ausgefüllt wurde
k.A.
NA
2
Start.Sprache
k.A.
{de=deutsch}
NA
3
Schulung
k.A.
k.A.
NA
4
bz.fb
k.A.
{0=schlecht}{100=außergewöhnlich gut}
NA
5
Zeit.ideal
k.A.
k.A.
NA
6
Zeit1.frueher
k.A.
k.A.
NA
7
Zeit1.spaeter
k.A.
k.A.
NA
8
Zeit2.frueher
k.A.
k.A.
NA
9
Zeit2.spaeter
k.A.
k.A.
NA
Page 1 of 4
Items per page: 10 25 50
Utilized Test Methods
Bell, K. J. (2008). Intimate partner violence on campus: A test of social learning theory (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania).
Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index (translated to German by Greischel, Johnson & Schmukle). Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German Version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000058
PSYNDEX
Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 30(8), 821-835.
Hagemeyer, B., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). Assessing implicit motivational orientations in couple relationships: The Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT). Psychological Assessment, 24, 114–28. doi:10.1037/a0024822
PSYNDEX
Hagemeyer, B., Neyer, F. J., Neberich, W., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2013). The ABC of Social Desires: Affiliation, being alone, and closeness to partner. European Journal of Personality, 27, 442–457. doi:10.1002/per.1857
PSYNDEX
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203– 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
Rogge, R. D., Fincham, F. D., Crasta, D., & Maniaci, M. R. (2017). Positive and negative evaluation of relationships: Development and validation of the Positive – Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) Scale. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1028–1043. doi: 10.1037/pas0000392
Russel, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 493-502.
Page 1 of 2
Items per page: 10 25 50